Skip to main content

Thoughts on Malcolm Gladwell's Talking to Strangers

Malcolm Gladwell Talking to Strangers (Hachette: Little, Brown, and Co, 2019)


When we interact with strangers, we tend to apply preset scripts to our interactions. Each of us seems to have a large personal collection of scripts ready to play whenever we encounter an unfamiliar person or group of people. 


Upon meeting someone such as a small child, we speak and act a certain way and have a pre-packaged set of beliefs about that little person. Likewise, when we meet a senior citizen, a person of a different race, a person who appears to be similar to ourselves, or a very different person, we are prepared for that interaction with our preconceptions of who they are, what they will do, and how we should behave with them. Such preconceptions are often maligned but they can be helpful. Our preconceptions are shortcuts that smooth social interactions that might otherwise be unpredictable. We consider the person who is unable to do this as lacking in social skills. Someone who is perpetually surprised by people is at a disadvantage.


Some of our major political figures have the gift of interacting with strangers. We could quibble over the details, but the young Bill Clinton comes to mind. Justin Trudeau. Queen Elizabeth II. We are no longer supposed to mention Sir John A. Macdonald but he was said to have this gift too. The top-tier communicator knows what to say, to who, and when.


Most of us are not smooth-talking social wizards. We know that interactions with strangers go badly wrong. We encounter people who do not fit our preconceptions. We apply the wrong scripts to the wrong people.


We filter encounters with strangers through a jumble of experiences, stories, and personal characteristics that make up our mindset. Likewise, Malcolm Gladwell’s book, Talking to Strangers, uses a collection of stories and thoughts to write about encounters with strangers. 


Although the various reflections are interesting and at points riveting, I was not convinced that the book as a whole added up to a compelling argument or a clear point of view on Talking to Strangers.


Gladwell begins the book with the story of Sandra Bland, an African-American woman from Chicago. Ms. Bland is a promising young new hire at Prairie View A&M University near Houston, Texas. Shortly after she arrives, she is pulled over in her car by a thirty-year-old police officer, Brian Encinia for a minor infraction. The encounter begins with apparent civility but goes downhill as Officer Encinia makes a series of escalating demands and Ms. Bland does not readily comply. The incident becomes a confrontation that ends with Ms. Bland in jail. Three days later, Ms. Bland commits suicide in her cell.


This news piece could mean a lot of different things in the aftermath of the Floyd George societal crisis this summer. In 2019, Gladwell writes about this story as an encounter between strangers.


Gladwell describes the terrible encounter between Cortes and the Aztec ruler Montezuma. It appears that each one thought the other intended to surrender to the other. In that encounter, twenty million Aztecs perished due to warfare or disease. 


He tells the story of Florentino Aspillaga, a high-ranking official in the Cuban intelligence service and a defector to the United States. Aspillaga reveals the extent to which the CIA is compromised by Cuban spies. Gladwell tells the story to ask ‘Why can’t we tell when the stranger in front of us is lying to our face? In chapter two, he tells the fascinating story of Neville Chamberlain’s reliance on the words of Adolf Hitler. Chamberlain believes Hitler but does not understand him at all.


Probably the most interesting story in the book is a comparison of the results produced by New York city judges and computers. With less information about defendants, the computers get better results. The additional information helps to mislead the judges into giving wrong answers. Like most people, I think, I would assume that more information is always better.


Gladwell begins a discussion of how we are inclined to default to the truth with the story of a Cuban spy who rises high in the American intelligence service. Despite evidence and opportunities to expose Ana Montes as a Cuban spy, it does not happen. The story of Bernie Madoff is remarkable for the length of time and amounts of money that are made in his scams.


Gladwell has a point but sometimes we default to truth and sometimes we default to untruth.  It is helpful to reflect on times when we do one or the other. In the sad story of the victims of Jerry Sandusky at Pennsylvania State University, they are not believed for many years.


Chapter six is fascinating because it shows how professional actors, in the television show Friends, telegraph truthfulness and falsehood through their portrayals of their characters. Gladwell refers to the idea of transparency. The way people represent themselves on the outside provides an authentic and reliable window into the way they feel on the inside. These representations vary according to culture. 


Gladwell tackles several difficult sexual assault cases in terms of myopia, especially myopia that is generated by intoxication. This state disinhibits a person from understanding and behaving appropriately toward another person. 


Rather than coming to a definitive conclusion, I enjoyed the opportunity to have a long rambling conversation with Malcolm Gladwell about the matter of Talking to Strangers. I look forward to my next ‘conversation’ with this fascinating writer.




Popular posts from this blog

Donor-centred Fundraising?

The notion of “donor-centred fundraising” raises alarm bells. It seems to share ideological roots with corporations that proclaim they are ‘customer-centred’.1For example, Amazon.com’s highly-vaunted customer focus has been widely vilified for coming at the expense of other stakeholders, especially employees and suppliers.2 Corporations such as Walmart, Amazon, McDonald’s, and Uber with questionable records on caring for employees, suppliers, the environment, and communities use the language of ‘customer care’. For generations, non-profit sector employees have struggled with reasonable work hours, fair pay, benefits, job security, and opportunities for advancement. Does ‘donor-centred fundraising’ represents yet another assault on the non-profit worker? In a local example, an agency went all out upon the arrival of a $50,000 donation. (I think the donation was a portion of a real estate sales fee). There was a dinner, plaque, and public acclaim for the donor. Meanwhile, the agency did …

Russell Freedman's, Lincoln: A Photobiography

'Just completed a classic of American history for young people, Russell Freedman's, Lincoln: A Photobiography (HMH Books for Young Readers, 1989). Back in its day, the book won a coveted Newbery Medal.







For this Canadian, Freedman's book was an excellent and reliable introduction to President Abraham Lincoln's story. Insofar as I remember the general outline of Lincoln's public life, Freedman covers the bases in a dependable manner and includes an amazing series of archival photographs. The cover photo of a clean shaven Lincoln is fascinating. Apparently, Lincoln was the most photographed man of his time.

Perhaps the most striking thing about the book was its tone. Freedman manages to present Lincoln in a way that is appealing and upbeat while not sweeping away the darkness of his time and work or the depression in his personality and family.


The book sweeps through events and words of epic proportions - and helpfully includes a selection of Lincoln quot…

Mark Twain and Early Rising

“Give a man a reputation as an early riser and he can sleep 'til noon.”
― Mark Twain


Mark Twain lived in an era of self help books and ambitious go-getters. In protest, he wrote Early Rising, As Regards Excursions to the Cliff House, all about the perils and madness of early rising.

The writer of Tom Sawyer and Huck Finn, is of course, an authority on all
aspects of life and work. I wonder though if Mr. Twain too easily surrendered early morning to those hyper-productive worker bees who are annoying at the best of times, but unbearable in the early morning hours?
I used to be one of these. In my younger days, I remember occasionally calling a few wealthy investors with urgent news in the early morning hours. I would ask, "did I wake you?" Without fail, they would say "no" and sometimes, "no, I was looking forward to your call." Back then, the guys with the expensive houses and cars would never admit that they slept. 
Mark Twain might have known the secre…