Skip to main content

Review of Big Business: A Love Letter to an American Anti-Hero by Tyler Cowen, New York: St. Martin´s Press, 2019

 Big Business: A Love Letter to an American Anti-Hero by [Tyler Cowen]

Tyler Cowen is an American economist who teaches economics at George Mason University. In 2011, he was ranked at number 72 among the ¨Top 100 Global Thinkers¨ by Foreign Policy Magazine. He has written admired books. David Brooks called Cowen one of the most influential bloggers on the right¨. 

Predictably, I wrinkled up my nose when I saw the title for this book, ¨Big Business: A Love Letter to an American Anti-Hero¨. How could a respected economist, even a ´right-wing' economist, write a love letter to big business?

It turns out that this is a winsome and irenic look at American big business. The book is pleasant, easy to read, and not over-long. I wondered if the easy feel of the book was an intended rebuke to the dense tomes of French, left-wing´ superstar economist Thomas Piketty?

Cowen complains that a lot of Americans do not like big business: young people, Bernie Sanders supporters (!), the Media (and Social Media), ordinary Americans, Trump Supporters and the Conservative Right.

A less intrepid soul might surrender to the popular view of big business as a domineering bully. For example, Franklin Foer made a good case against the tech giants in his book ´World Without Mind: The Existential Threat of Big Tech´.

But Cowen plunges on to argue that the most common criticisms of American business do not stand up to scrutiny.  What he does is work through a few of these criticisms - probably too few in my view - and come out the other side having vanquished the opponents of big business.

In Chapter 2, Cowen asks the question ´Are Businesses more Fraudulent than the rest of us?´ The buoyant tone contrasts oddly with the demoralizing content. He argues that American businesses are no less ethical than individuals. Rather than launch into a discussion of the basic goodness of ordinary people, he illustrates dishonesty and fraud committed by ordinary people and includes a notable discussion of the unethical behavior of professional ethicists. If companies are bad, it is only because people are bad. He dismisses any claim that particularly bad people are attracted to the corporate world. He concludes the chapter with assurance that the actions of corporations are influenced by the importance of trustworthiness to their public reputations.

From there, he launches into chapter three, Are CEO´s Paid Too Much? Clearly, only the staunchest business advocate will suggest that business executives are paid fairly so it will be interesting to see what Cowen does here. Apparently, people who are able and willing to run large organisations are hard to find. The organisations they run are so large and complex that these individuals merit enormous pay packets. He devotes pages to the benefits of long-time CEO´s to their corporations. Unfortunately, he does not address the possibility that there may be many people who might be capable of running these organisations if only educational and executive opportunities were offered to a wider range of people. He certainly does not address the puzzling question that if competent CEO´s are so hard to find, why is it that some companies need to look no further than the founder´s family for highly paid leadership. For instance, Lachlan Murdoch of News Corp. He also does not address the questionable culture of the celebrity CEO or the problem of weakening corporate governance.

We can expect Chapter four to be deeply conservative when it asks, ´Is Work Fun? Basically, Cowen says that working for a large corporation is great. The only problem he addresses is that of harassment. Workers are not oppressed and are better off in typical modern American corporations than they would be managing themselves or working in labour-controlled organisations. Cowen is blissfully unaware of suffering among workers in the Rust Belt or Amazon warehouses, laid off in favour of cheaper offshore labour or the ordinary cruelties of corporate life. He does not mention the misery of lowly contract teachers in his own American university system.

In chapter five, Cowen asks ´How Monopolistic is American Business, chapter six, Are The Big Tech Companies Evil? And Chapter Seven, What is Wall Street Good For, Anyway? And Chapter Eight, Crony Capitalism: How Much Does Big Business Control the American Government. By now, you get the idea. In a book so ideologically driven, you don't really need to do more than skim. 

Of course, corporations are not overly dominant and there is plenty of competition. He ignores the role of government in maintaining free markets. Google, Facebook, Apple etc. are just fine. He believes that venture capital drives innovation and Wall Street enriches ordinary Americans. Wall Street is even good for foreign countries. Of course, corporations are not overly influential in Washington.

Although much of the book is bland, predictable right-wing ideology, Cowen´s conclusion is slightly more interesting. He argues that we dislike corporations because we tend to personalise them. We want them to be our friends and are disappointed when we learn that they are not. He summarises the book’s argument: ¨It is fine to remain sceptical about business; indeed, in many particular cases our scepticism forces business to improve. At the same time, we should be much less hostile to business in general, and much more appreciative of its role in improving our lives, whether as consumers or as workers, or possibly as entrepreneurs ourselves.¨

I would recommend this book as the most optimistic possible view of the contemporary American corporation.

Popular posts from this blog

Easy ways to bank like a pro

Most Canadians do banking exactly the way they are told by the bankers. This a mistake. Let’s do better. Here’s why. “No Soup for You!” Years ago, I was working at a bank branch one sunny summer afternoon. A man came in with a couple of wriggly, little kids in tow. He filled out one of those withdrawal slips that oldtimers may remember. The young father waited patiently in line while struggling to maintain order, gradually making his way up to our bank teller. Finally, he arrived and exchanged the usual pleasantries to the smiling teller. He presented his withdrawal slip. The teller began doing some banking magic on the computer terminal. There was a hesitation and then a frown. Then a polite, nervous smile. The manager was called. The manager did a little more magic on the computer terminal. Now the branch manager was frowning. Everyone was frowning, even the two small children who had been busy with other business were frowning. Finally, the verdict was brought in. There was a probl

Film Review of Beautiful Boy (2018)

Most of my short film reviews look at great classic films. This movie is different in that it received a mixed reception when it was released in 2018. On Rotten Tomatoes , the aggregated rating for Beautiful Boy is only 67% and some of the reviews are scathing.  The low score for this movie is something of a puzzle. The film offers good acting by rising star Timothee Chalamet , reliable Steve Carell , and excellent supporting actors such as Maura Tierney and Amy Ryan . It is well-made and has moments of poignancy and intensity. Beautiful Boy is based on separate memoirs written by David Sheff , the father in the story and Nic Sheff , the son. The film reflects some of the limitations of personal memoirs written at a young age or a narrow point of view, but within the given framework the film is well-written. Beautiful Boy tells the story of a father-son relationship during a time when son Nic (Timothy Chalamet) is in his late teens and early twenties and addicted to drugs. They are cl

Gambling that a vaccine will be discovered before the money runs out

  We should be deeply disappointed at the feeble political response to Covid. Little payments here and there (adding up to many billions in aggregate) do little but temporarily prevent people from being turned into the streets and starving. What we urgently need is a wartime economy, intended to last until a vaccine is widely distributed: close non-essential services, repatriate essential industries (back to Canada), transition people into new ways of life and lines of work, and infrastructure projects that absorb displaced workers. Most of the middle class still enjoy the rivers of money that flow from government and corporate accounts. So our politicians and bureaucrats don't feel an urgency for making large-scale change. Will these rivers of money run dry if things continue as they are? Our leaders are gambling that the poor can be ignored and the middle and upper classes can be placated until good times return.