Skip to main content

Donor-centred Fundraising?

The notion of “donor-centred fundraising” raises alarm bells. It seems to share ideological roots with corporations that proclaim they are ‘customer-centred’.1   For example,’s highly-vaunted customer focus has been widely vilified for coming at the expense of other stakeholders, especially employees and suppliers.2 Corporations such as Walmart, Amazon, McDonald’s, and Uber with questionable records on caring for employees, suppliers, the environment, and communities use the language of ‘customer care’.
For generations, non-profit sector employees have struggled with reasonable work hours, fair pay, benefits, job security, and opportunities for advancement. Does ‘donor-centred fundraising’ represents yet another assault on the non-profit worker?
In a local example, an agency went all out upon the arrival of a $50,000 donation. (I think the donation was a portion of a real estate sales fee). There was a dinner, plaque, and public acclaim for the donor. Meanwhile, the agency did little to provide satisfactory employment and recognition to a revolving door of underpaid front line staff working in unsafe facilities with at-risk clients. The staff were expected to attend the dinner in the evening, on their own time.
Richard Branson is probably the most famous advocate of one contrasting approach. He says “take care of your employees, and they’ll take care of your business. It’s as simple as that.” 3
Although the phrase ‘donor-centred’ is troubling, the written material does not openly advocate following through on the implied threat to other stakeholders such as employees.
‘Donor-centred’ appears to be more of a catchphrase. It indicates that donors are essential to the success of the mission. Working with donors requires an understanding of the donor’s interests and objectives. Donors want to know that their donations are not wasted and are put to work on worthwhile things. They want good-quality communication which means fine-tuning publications, resources, websites and social media so that these reach particular donors in ways that are meaningful to each of them.
In thinking about this subject, I realized that it is unusual to be asked, ‘what motivated you to support our charity?’ or, ‘we haven’t seen you at any of our events this year, what is missing for you?’ I have also felt the sense that after making a donation, the money and organization disappear unless you give a lot of money.
I found the ‘donor-centric Pledge’ helpful in framing a discussion with donors and potential supporters. 4 It offers a list of simple, memorable rules for keeping the donor front and centre. Here is # 22. “That the donor's perspective defines what is a "major" gift.”
            I find ideas about understanding and communicating with donors to be helpful. I also understand why fundraising consultants adopt current language from the corporate world. Although the ideas have been sufficiently ‘watered-down’ and ‘humanized’ to be palatable in a social justice environment, I wonder if some of the baggage from an increasingly unjust corporate world has been carried along with them. I can imagine this material produced by well-meaning fundraising specialists might be used to further pressure hard-pressed social service workers. Will someone be forced to do unpaid overtime, writing thank you notes by hand and from home late tonight because donors should get one within twenty-four hours?

            ‘After all, the donor/customer comes first!’  

Popular posts from this blog

Easy ways to bank like a pro

Most Canadians do banking exactly the way they are told by the bankers. This a mistake. Let’s do better. Here’s why. “No Soup for You!” Years ago, I was working at a bank branch one sunny summer afternoon. A man came in with a couple of wriggly, little kids in tow. He filled out one of those withdrawal slips that oldtimers may remember. The young father waited patiently in line while struggling to maintain order, gradually making his way up to our bank teller. Finally, he arrived and exchanged the usual pleasantries to the smiling teller. He presented his withdrawal slip. The teller began doing some banking magic on the computer terminal. There was a hesitation and then a frown. Then a polite, nervous smile. The manager was called. The manager did a little more magic on the computer terminal. Now the branch manager was frowning. Everyone was frowning, even the two small children who had been busy with other business were frowning. Finally, the verdict was brought in. There was a probl

Film Review of Beautiful Boy (2018)

Most of my short film reviews look at great classic films. This movie is different in that it received a mixed reception when it was released in 2018. On Rotten Tomatoes , the aggregated rating for Beautiful Boy is only 67% and some of the reviews are scathing.  The low score for this movie is something of a puzzle. The film offers good acting by rising star Timothee Chalamet , reliable Steve Carell , and excellent supporting actors such as Maura Tierney and Amy Ryan . It is well-made and has moments of poignancy and intensity. Beautiful Boy is based on separate memoirs written by David Sheff , the father in the story and Nic Sheff , the son. The film reflects some of the limitations of personal memoirs written at a young age or a narrow point of view, but within the given framework the film is well-written. Beautiful Boy tells the story of a father-son relationship during a time when son Nic (Timothy Chalamet) is in his late teens and early twenties and addicted to drugs. They are cl

Gambling that a vaccine will be discovered before the money runs out

  We should be deeply disappointed at the feeble political response to Covid. Little payments here and there (adding up to many billions in aggregate) do little but temporarily prevent people from being turned into the streets and starving. What we urgently need is a wartime economy, intended to last until a vaccine is widely distributed: close non-essential services, repatriate essential industries (back to Canada), transition people into new ways of life and lines of work, and infrastructure projects that absorb displaced workers. Most of the middle class still enjoy the rivers of money that flow from government and corporate accounts. So our politicians and bureaucrats don't feel an urgency for making large-scale change. Will these rivers of money run dry if things continue as they are? Our leaders are gambling that the poor can be ignored and the middle and upper classes can be placated until good times return.